The Expository Times

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt-Leukel, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Expository Times, Vol. 118, No. 3, 113-119 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689

Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine

Perry Schmidt-Leukel

University of Glasgow

Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching.

Key Words: Christology • Chalcedon • incarnation • theology of religions • religious pluralism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?